Voom Vacuum Reviews: Why You Should Skip This Sweeper?

Let’s cut to the chase: cleaning shouldn’t feel like a workout, and you deserve a vacuum that delivers without drama. I tested the Voom Sweeper, hoping its lightweight, cordless design and 360° swivel would revolutionize my routine.

Spoiler alert: it didn’t live up to the hype. In this article, I’ll share my real-world experience, break down the pros and cons, offer maintenance tips, and compare it to other brands.

If you’re eyeing the Voom, read on—you might want to rethink that purchase.

My Experience With The Voom Sweeper

I was thrilled when my Voom Sweeper arrived. At under 2 pounds, it felt like a feather compared to my clunky old upright vacuum. The promise of cordless freedom, 360° swivel tech, and a self-cleaning roller had me picturing effortless cleaning sessions.

I charged it up (which took about 4 hours), and the sleek design looked promising on my kitchen counter. With pets and kids leaving crumbs and fur everywhere, I hoped this would be my go-to for quick cleanups.

First, I tried it on my hardwood floors. The multi-surface sliders glided smoothly, and the micro-bristles, spinning at 1,200 RPMs, picked up light dust and pet hair decently. It was satisfying to see the catch tray fill up without needing a dustbag.

The cordless design meant no tripping over cords, and I could zip around furniture with ease. Emptying the tray was a breeze—just a button press, and the debris dumped right into the trash.

But then I moved to my living room’s low-pile area rug, and the magic fizzled. The motor slowed, sometimes stopping entirely, as if the rug was too much for it. I had to restart it multiple times, which was frustrating.

On thicker carpets, it was a no-go; the brush roll jammed, and I ended up pushing dirt around. The edge-cleaning feature? Overhyped. It left dust bunnies along baseboards, forcing me to grab a broom for corners.

The battery lasted about 45 minutes, not the advertised 60, and the short USB charger meant I had to charge it on a countertop—gross and inconvenient.

By the end of my week-long test, I was disappointed. The Voom felt like a toy, not a serious cleaning tool. It’s fine for quick hardwood sweeps but falls short on carpets and edges. For $60, I expected more power and reliability.

Let’s break down what worked, what didn’t, and whether it’s worth your money.

Pros of The Voom Sweeper

• Lightweight and Portable: At just under 2 pounds, the Voom is a dream to carry. I could tote it upstairs or around tight corners without breaking a sweat. If you’ve got mobility issues or hate lugging heavy vacuums, this is a big win. It’s compact enough to store in a closet without taking up much space, which is perfect for small apartments.
• Cordless Convenience: No cords, no hassle. The rechargeable 7.4V battery let me clean without being tethered to an outlet. I loved zipping from room to room without unplugging and replugging. For quick touch-ups on hardwood or tile, this freedom is a game-changer, especially in homes with lots of open floor space.
• Easy to Empty: The bagless design and easy-empty catch tray are a highlight. After a cleaning session, I pressed a button, and the debris dumped straight into the trash—no messy bags or filters to wrestle with. It’s a small but satisfying feature that makes cleanup less of a chore.
• Smooth on Hard Surfaces: On hardwood, tile, or laminate, the Voom performs decently. The multi-surface sliders transition smoothly, and the micro-bristles grab light debris like dust, crumbs, and pet hair. If your home is mostly hard floors, it can handle daily touch-ups without much fuss.
• Quiet Operation: Compared to my roaring upright vacuum, the Voom is whisper-quiet. I could clean while my kids napped without waking them. It’s not silent, but it’s far less disruptive than most vacuums, which is a plus for early-morning or late-night cleanups.

Cons of The Voom Sweeper

• Weak on Carpets: The Voom’s biggest flaw is its carpet performance. On low-pile rugs, it struggled, with the motor slowing or stopping. On thicker carpets, it was useless—the brush roll jammed, and it pushed dirt around instead of picking it up. If you’ve got carpeted rooms, this isn’t the sweeper for you. Many users on Walmart and Amazon echoed this, saying it “binds up” or “won’t move” on rugs.
• Poor Edge Cleaning: Despite claims of edge-to-edge cleaning, the Voom left dust and debris along baseboards. I had to follow up with a broom or handheld vacuum, which defeated the purpose of an all-in-one tool. Reviews on sites like voomlabs.com noted it “doesn’t get close to edges,” and I agree—it’s a letdown for thorough cleaning.
• Flimsy Build Quality: The Voom feels like a $20 toy, not a $60 sweeper. The plastic body and bendable rubber handle loop screamed cheap. The Velcro strip on the bottom fell off after one use, and the small emptying button was fiddly. Users on Walmart called it “cheaply made” and “flimsy,” and I can’t argue. It doesn’t feel built to last.
• Short Battery Life: The advertised 60-minute runtime is optimistic. In my tests, it lasted 40-50 minutes, depending on the surface. If you’re cleaning a larger home, you’ll need to recharge mid-session, which takes 4 hours. The short USB charger also forces awkward charging spots, like countertops, which isn’t ideal. Other users complained about the battery dying quickly, too.
• Noisy Hype, Underwhelming Power: The 1,200 RPM micro-bristles sound impressive, but the suction is weak. It struggled with anything heavier than light dust or pet hair, like small crumbs or gravel. On hard floors, it sometimes spit debris back out or passed over it entirely. Reviews on scamfinder.blog and ibisik.com called the suction “noticeably weak,” and my experience matched.

Maintenance Tips For The Voom Sweeper

1. Clean the Catch Tray Regularly: To keep the Voom running smoothly, empty the catch tray after every use. I found that a full tray reduced suction, so dump it into the trash with the push-button feature. Wipe the tray with a damp cloth to remove stuck-on dust, and let it dry completely before reattaching to avoid clogs.
2. Check the Roller for Hair: Despite the “anti-clog” claim, hair still wraps around the roller, especially with long pet or human hair. Use the included cleaning tool to cut and remove tangles weekly. I spent 5 minutes every few days clearing hair to prevent the roller from jamming, which helped maintain performance.
3. Charge Properly: The 7.4V battery needs a full 4-hour charge to hit its max runtime. Don’t leave it plugged in overnight, as it can overheat and degrade the battery. Store the USB cable and power block in a dry place, and avoid charging on surfaces like countertops to keep things sanitary.
4. Inspect the Micro-Bristles: The 1,200 RPM micro-bristles are the Voom’s workhorse, but they can wear down or get clogged with debris. Every month, check for matted bristles or stuck dirt. Gently clean them with a soft brush or cloth to keep them spinning freely. This step saved me from losing suction over time.
5. Store in a Dry Place: Moisture can damage the Voom’s battery and electronics. Store it in a dry, cool closet or cupboard, away from humid areas like bathrooms. I kept mine in a hallway closet, which prevented any corrosion and ensured it was ready for use.

Comparison of Voom Vacuum With Other Brands

You’re probably wondering how the Voom Sweeper stacks up against other cordless stick vacuums and sweepers. I’ve tested the Voom alongside the Shark Stratos Cordless, Dyson V15 Detect, and BISSELL PerfectSweep Turbo, and I’m breaking it down in a head-to-head comparison.

Let’s see which one deserves a spot in your cleaning arsenal.

• Voom Sweeper Vs. Shark Stratos Cordless

The Shark Stratos Cordless, priced around $400, is a premium pick that makes the Voom look like a toy.

When I used the Shark, its dual-roller floorhead devoured pet hair, crumbs, and even small gravel on both carpets and hardwood with ease.

The Voom, on the other hand, stalled on low-pile rugs and couldn’t handle thicker carpets at all—its 1,200 RPM micro-bristles just don’t have the muscle.

Shark’s Clean Sense IQ tech automatically adjusts suction based on debris, so I didn’t have to fiddle with settings, unlike the Voom’s one-mode-fits-all approach.

The Shark’s 60-minute battery runtime was consistent, while the Voom’s 40-50 minutes fell short of its 60-minute claim. At 6.6 pounds, the Shark is heavier than the Voom’s 2 pounds, but its sturdy build feels like it’ll last years, not weeks.

The Stratos also has an odor-neutralizing cartridge, keeping my home fresher than the Voom ever could. If you want a versatile, powerful vacuum for all surfaces, Shark wins hands-down.

• Voom Sweeper Vs. Dyson V15 Detect

The Dyson V15 Detect, retailing at about $700, is a high-tech beast that leaves the Voom in the dust. When I tested the Dyson, its laser-equipped floorhead lit up hidden dust on my hardwood, making cleaning almost fun. The Voom’s edge-to-edge brush? It missed dust along baseboards entirely.

Dyson’s Piezo sensor adjusts suction automatically, tackling thick carpets and hard floors with precision, while the Voom’s weak suction struggled with anything heavier than pet hair.

The Dyson’s 0.76L dustbin held way more than the Voom’s tiny catch tray, meaning fewer trips to the trash. At 6.8 pounds, the Dyson is heavier, but its premium build screams quality, unlike the Voom’s flimsy plastic.

The V15’s 60-minute battery matched its claim, and its LCD screen showed real-time performance stats—something the Voom’s basic design can’t touch. For those who can splurge, Dyson’s superior power and tech make it a clear winner.

• Voom Sweeper Vs. BISSELL PerfectSweep Turbo

At $60, the BISSELL PerfectSweep Turbo is a budget-friendly rival that outshines the Voom in almost every way. When I tried the BISSELL, its powered brush roll handled low-pile carpets better than the Voom, picking up pet hair and light debris without jamming.

The Voom’s brush roll, by contrast, slowed or stopped on even thin rugs. BISSELL’s edge-cleaning was more effective, grabbing dust along baseboards where the Voom left messes behind. Both are lightweight—BISSELL at 3 pounds, Voom under 2—but the BISSELL’s sturdier build didn’t feel like it would break after a week.

The PerfectSweep Turbo’s 7.2V battery delivered a reliable 60 minutes, compared to the Voom’s inconsistent 40-50. Emptying both is easy, but BISSELL’s larger dust cup meant less frequent dumping. The Voom’s wild 360° swivel made it harder to control than BISSELL’s smoother handling.

For the same price, BISSELL offers better performance and durability, making it the smarter budget buy.

In this showdown, the Voom Sweeper’s lightweight, cordless design is its only real edge, but it’s overshadowed by weak suction, poor carpet performance, and a cheap build.

The Shark Stratos Cordless dominates with power and versatility, the Dyson V15 Detect dazzles with tech and precision, and the BISSELL PerfectSweep Turbo delivers better value at the same price. Unless you only need a quick hard-floor sweeper for a tiny space, these competitors leave the Voom eating dust.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Conclusion: Save Your Money

After testing the Voom Sweeper, I can’t recommend it. Its lightweight design and cordless ease are overshadowed by weak suction, poor carpet performance, and a cheap build that feels like it’ll break.

For $60, you’re better off with a BISSELL PerfectSweep Turbo or saving up for a Shark Stratos. Don’t fall for the TV ad hype—your floors deserve better.