I’ve been juicing for years, chasing that perfect glass of vibrant, nutrient-packed goodness. When it came time to upgrade my juicer, I found myself torn between the Kuvings B6000 and C7000.
Both are celebrated for their wide-feed chutes and slow-masticating magic, but which one truly delivers?
In this article, I’ll share my hands-on experience, breaking down the pros and cons of each model to help you decide which juicer deserves a spot on your counter. From juice quality to cleanup, I’ve got you covered with a detailed comparison.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | Kuvings B6000 | Kuvings C7000 |
| Feed Chute Size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Motor Power | 240 watts, 60 RPM | 240 watts, 60 RPM |
| Juice Yield | Good, slightly less efficient | Higher, optimized for leafy greens |
| Ease of Cleaning | Moderate, some leakage issues | Easier, redesigned parts |
| Accessories | Sorbet maker | Sorbet maker, hopper, pulp strainer |
| Noise Level | ~50-63 dB | ~50-63 dB |
| Weight | 18 lbs | 18 lbs |
| Warranty | 10 years | 10 years |
| Price (USD) | ~$300-$350 | ~$350-$400 |
| Colors | Red, Silver, White | Gold, Red, Silver |
| Smoothie Strainer | Optional ($35) | Optional ($55) |
| Build Quality | Good, some durability concerns | Improved, sturdier base |
Why Kuvings Caught My Eye?
Juicing isn’t just a hobby for me; it’s a lifestyle. There’s something deeply satisfying about transforming a pile of kale, apples, and carrots into a glass of liquid sunshine.
Over the years, I’ve tried centrifugal juicers that screamed like jet engines and left me with foamy, oxidized juice. When I discovered slow juicers, everything changed. Kuvings, a South Korean brand, stood out for its innovative wide-feed chute—a game-changer that promised less chopping and more juicing.
The B6000 and C7000, both vertical masticating juicers, seemed like the perfect contenders for my kitchen. But choosing between them wasn’t easy, so I put both through their paces.
Unboxing The Kuvings B6000
The B6000 was Kuvings’ first stab at a wide-mouth vertical juicer, launched in 2013.
When I unboxed it, I was struck by its solid build.
At 18 pounds, it’s no lightweight, but that heft screams durability—at least initially. The 3-inch feed chute was a revelation.
I could drop in small apples or whole carrots without spending ages prepping.
The 240-watt motor, spinning at a leisurely 60 RPM, crushes produce gently, preserving nutrients and minimizing oxidation.
The juice? Smooth, vibrant, and packed with flavor.
The B6000 comes with a sorbet maker, which I used to whip up frozen mango sorbet that tasted like summer in a bowl. Its smart cap—a nifty feature to prevent drips—kept my counter clean, and the BPA-free plastics gave me peace of mind. But it wasn’t all sunshine.
Cleaning the B6000 was a bit of a chore. The juice bowl had rubber and silicone pieces that trapped pulp, and I spent extra time scrubbing nooks and crannies. I also noticed occasional leaks, which was frustrating. Some users report durability issues, like cracking lids, which made me question its long-term reliability.
Pros of The Kuvings B6000
- Wide Feed Chute: The 3-inch chute cuts down on prep time. I tossed in whole small apples and halved carrots with ease.
- Quiet Operation: At around 50-63 dB, it’s quiet enough to juice early without waking the household.
- High-Quality Juice: The slow 60 RPM minimizes oxidation, delivering nutrient-rich juice with minimal foam.
- Sorbet Maker Included: Making frozen desserts is a fun bonus, perfect for kids or summer treats.
- Affordable Price: At $300-$350, it’s typically $50 cheaper than the C7000, making it a budget-friendly option.
- 10-Year Warranty: The lengthy warranty offers peace of mind, covering parts and labor.
Cons of The Kuvings B6000
- Cleaning Challenges: The juice bowl’s rubber pieces and tight crevices make cleaning tedious, taking 5-10 minutes.
- Durability Concerns: Some users report cracking lids or other parts breaking within a year or two.
- Leakage Issues: The juice bowl occasionally leaks, which can be messy during juicing.
- Less Efficient with Leafy Greens: It struggles slightly with kale or spinach, producing less yield than the C7000.
- No Hopper or Pulp Strainer: Lacks accessories for small fruits or pulp control, which the C7000 includes.
- Optional Smoothie Strainer: Costs $35 extra, which feels like a nickel-and-dime move.
Exploring The Kuvings C7000: The Upgraded Elite Model
The C7000, released in 2016, is the B6000’s polished successor.
Unboxing it felt like meeting the B6000’s cooler, more refined sibling.
It shares the same 240-watt motor and 60 RPM speed, but Kuvings made thoughtful upgrades.
The 3-inch feed chute remains, but a detachable hopper makes it easier to juice small items like grapes or berries.
The redesigned juice bowl eliminates the pesky rubber pieces that plagued the B6000, reducing leaks and simplifying cleanup.
The auger screw is optimized for leafy greens, and the juicing screen has a rubber piece for better extraction.
I loved the C7000’s sturdier motor base and sleek chrome-plated smart cap, which added a touch of luxury. The included pulp strainer let me fine-tune the juice’s texture, and the sorbet maker was just as delightful as the B6000’s.
My kale-heavy green juice came out smoother and yielded more than with the B6000. However, the C7000 isn’t perfect. It’s pricier, typically $350-$400, and the smoothie strainer is an expensive $55 add-on. It’s also heavy, and while it’s not dishwasher-safe, the included cleaning tools made scrubbing bearable.
Pros of The Kuvings C7000
- Improved Juice Yield: The redesigned auger and screen extract more juice, especially from leafy greens like kale.
- Easier to Clean: The updated juice bowl and cleaning tools cut cleanup time to 5-7 minutes.
- Additional Accessories: Comes with a hopper for small fruits and a pulp strainer for smoother juice.
- Sturdier Build: The sleeker motor base and improved parts feel more durable than the B6000.
- Versatile Performance: Handles soft fruits, hard veggies, and leafy greens with ease, plus makes nut milks and sorbets.
- 10-Year Warranty: Like the B6000, it’s backed by a robust warranty for long-term reliability.
Cons of The Kuvings C7000
- Higher Price: At $350-$400, it’s a bigger investment than the B6000.
- Optional Smoothie Strainer: Costs $55, which feels steep compared to the B6000’s $35 add-on.
- Still Heavy: At 18 pounds, it’s not easy to move around the kitchen.
- Not Dishwasher-Safe: Manual cleaning is required, though it’s less tedious than the B6000.
- Occasional Jamming: Can jam with large, hard produce if fed too quickly, requiring the reverse function.
- Learning Curve for Assembly: First-time users may find the many parts tricky to assemble.
Key Differences Between Kuvings B6000 And C7000 Slow Juicers
Both juicers share the same core DNA: a 3-inch feed chute, 240-watt motor, and 60 RPM speed. They’re quiet, produce high-quality juice, and come with a 10-year warranty.
But the C7000 feels like a refined version of the B6000, addressing many of its predecessor’s flaws. Here’s how they stack up in key areas:
- Juice Quality and Yield
The B6000 produces excellent juice with minimal foam, but it struggles with leafy greens, leaving some juice behind.
My green juice tests with kale and spinach yielded about 10-15% less compared to the C7000.
The C7000’s upgraded auger and juicing screen maximize extraction, especially for fibrous veggies.
In my tests, the C7000’s “Romaine-Apple-Orange” juice was smoother and less watery, though it had a slight bitter undertone with beets.
If you’re a green juice fanatic like me, the C7000’s higher yield is a big win.
- Ease of Use
The B6000’s wide chute saves prep time, but its safety fin requires a pusher for larger items. The C7000’s hopper makes juicing small fruits like berries a breeze, and its smart cap prevents drips more effectively.
Both have a learning curve for assembly, but the C7000’s parts snap together more intuitively after a few tries. I found the C7000’s reverse function handy for occasional jams, though both juicers handle soft produce like apples and oranges well.
- Cleaning and Maintenance
Cleaning the B6000 was my least favorite part. The juice bowl’s rubber pieces trapped pulp, and leaks made the process messier. It took me 8-10 minutes to clean thoroughly.
The C7000, with its redesigned bowl and included cleaning tools, shaved a couple of minutes off the process. The rotating strainer brush is a lifesaver for both, but the C7000’s Y-shaped outlet and fewer rubber parts make it less frustrating.
Neither is dishwasher-safe, so you’re stuck with manual cleaning.
- Build and Durability
The B6000’s build is solid, but reports of cracking lids and early breakdowns raised red flags. I didn’t experience this, but it’s a concern for heavy users. The C7000 feels sturdier, with a sleeker motor base and improved parts.
Its chrome-plated smart cap and BPA-free materials add a premium touch. Both are heavy at 18 pounds, so they’re not ideal if you’re constantly moving your juicer.
- Accessories and Versatility
The B6000 comes with a sorbet maker, which I loved for making quick frozen treats. The C7000 ups the ante with a hopper and pulp strainer, giving you more control over juice texture and small produce.
Both require separate purchases for a smoothie strainer, but the C7000’s is pricier. Both can make nut milks and purees, but the C7000’s improved auger handles these tasks with less pulp in the final product.
- Price and Value
Price is where the B6000 shines. At $300-$350, it’s a more accessible entry into wide-chute slow juicing. The C7000, at $350-$400, feels like a premium upgrade, but the extra cost is justified by better yield, easier cleaning, and included accessories.
If you’re on a tight budget, the B6000 is a solid choice. But if you juice daily or prioritize leafy greens, the C7000’s improvements are worth the splurge.
My Real-World Testing: Juicing Like A Pro
To get a true sense of these juicers, I put them through a week-long juicing marathon.
I made everything from green juices with kale, cucumber, and apple to vibrant beet-carrot blends and even almond milk.
The B6000 handled soft fruits like oranges beautifully, producing bright, flavorful juice with minimal foam.
But with kale, I noticed more pulp in the juice and less yield. The C7000, on the other hand, crushed leafy greens, squeezing out every last drop.
Its juice was smoother, with less grit, though it took effort to push through denser produce like beets.
Cleanup was where the C7000 pulled ahead. The B6000’s leaks meant extra wiping down, and its strainer took longer to scrub. The C7000’s tools made quick work of pulp, and the redesigned bowl meant no leaks.
Both juicers were quiet, letting me juice at 6 a.m. without disturbing my family. The C7000’s hopper was a game-changer for juicing berries, saving me from chasing grapes around the chute.
Who Should Buy The B6000?
The B6000 is perfect if you’re new to juicing or on a budget. Its wide chute and quiet operation make it user-friendly, and the sorbet maker adds fun versatility.
It’s ideal for casual juicers who focus on soft fruits and veggies and don’t mind spending a bit more time cleaning. If you’re not juicing daily or heavily relying on leafy greens, the B6000’s lower price makes it a great value.
Who Should Buy The C7000?
The C7000 is for serious juicers like me who want maximum yield and minimal hassle. Its improved design, especially for leafy greens, makes it a must-have for green juice lovers.
The included accessories and easier cleanup justify the higher price if you juice frequently or want a more polished experience. It’s a long-term investment for health enthusiasts who value efficiency and durability.
Which Juicer Wins?
After weeks of juicing, cleaning, and comparing, the C7000 is my winner. Its higher yield, especially for leafy greens, and easier cleanup make it worth the extra $50-$100. The hopper and pulp strainer add versatility, and the sturdier build gives me confidence it’ll last.
That said, the B6000 isn’t a slouch. If your budget is tight or you’re a casual juicer, it’s a reliable choice that still delivers great juice. Ultimately, your choice depends on how often you juice and whether you prioritize yield and ease over cost.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The B1700 is a more basic model with a narrower feed chute (2.2 inches) compared to the C7000’s 3-inch chute. The C7000 has a more powerful 240-watt motor versus the B1700’s 170 watts, better juice yield, and includes accessories like a hopper and pulp strainer. The B1700 is cheaper but less versatile.
No, the C7000 and EVO820 are different. The EVO820 has a larger 3.2-inch flip-gate feed chute, eliminating the safety fin, and includes a smoothie strainer and sorbet maker as standard. The C7000 has a 3-inch chute with a safety fin and requires optional accessories.
The CS600 and CS700 are commercial juicers with larger capacities than the C7000. The CS600 has a 3-inch chute and can run for 30 minutes continuously, while the CS700 (Master Chef) has a 3.5-inch chute and advanced cooling for longer operation. Both are pricier and designed for business use.
The C7000 comes with a 10-year warranty covering all parts and labor, with shipping costs covered for the first year if warranty claims are made. Product registration is recommended but not required.
Conclusion: Your Path To Juicing Bliss
You’re standing at a crossroads, eyeing the Kuvings B6000 and C7000, wondering which will transform your mornings with fresh, vibrant juice. I’ve been there, and after juicing my way through both, I’m rooting for the C7000 for its superior yield and easier cleanup.
But if your wallet’s feeling the pinch, the B6000 still delivers solid performance. Whichever you choose, you’re investing in your health with a juicer that makes nutrient-packed drinks a breeze.
So, grab some produce, pick your champion, and start juicing—you won’t regret it.